|
|
Just the other day (15th
June 2016) I had the realization that Benveniste's data and Eweida's
dot blot data are two views of the same elephant!
We see that ultradilute IgE signals
are maximally active when Poincare's recurrence is full, but that there
is some activity even at intermediate iteration where we may imagine that
the congruence of the recurrence is only partial, Meanwhile,
we may indeed expect that with the DNA dot blot the recurrence must be
quite complete, quite exact, in order for the ultradilute signal to bind
its specific cDNA.
So (only) now I have an explanation
why in the dot blots not infrequently two adjacent iterations are active.
(And on one sample I saw there was once three adjacent
active iterations.) If you cut of the bottom (the less active iterations)
of Benveniste's data, it then closely conforms to the dot blot data!
|
